In has been put into service as a support

In the emphasis of
culture concerning oneself, the concept of cultural diversity is translated in
different contexts. It includes the exploration of self-construal, which plays as
a contributing factor in the behavior of the society. Many people may not have
heard the term Self-Construal, but actually,
it has significant role in the deviation among people. To further understand,
Self-Construal is rooted on the study of self-definition, in which it is
classified between two domains, particularly the independent of others and interdependent
with others. Basically, an independent self-construal is characterized by
separateness from others, by attention to one’s abilities, traits, preferences,
and wishes, and by the primacy of one’s individual goals over those of
in-groups. On the other hand, an interdependent self-construal is characterized
by a sense of fundamental connectedness with others, by attention to one’s role
in in-groups, and by the primacy of group goals over one’s individual goals (Cross, 2011).

In view thereof, the
cultural dimension of individualism and collectivism has been put into service
as a support theory to the relevance of self-construal in cultural diversity. As
an overview, individualism-collectivism is based on Hofsted’s lecture about Dimensions
of National Culture. The Individualism can be defined as a preference for a
loosely-knit social framework in which individuals are expected to take care of
only themselves and their immediate families. In contrary, Collectivism represents
a preference for a tightly-knit framework in society in which individuals can
expect their relatives or members of a particular in-group to look after them
in exchange for unquestioning loyalty. A society’s position on this dimension
is reflected in whether people’s self-image is defined in terms of “I” or “we.”
  (Hofstede, 2014)

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

As time goes by, many
professionals undertook this kind of research study to carefully examine the
significance of independent self-construal and interdependent self-construal using
the Individualism and Collectivism as a theoretical framework. (Markus & Kitayama, 1991) But taking a moment
to think, it is not actually difficult to realize the relevance of two domains
of Self-Construal into the illustration and clarifying details of individualism-collectivism.
As a matter of fact, Singelis (1994) launched the Self-Construal Scale (SCS) as
a tool to measure the domains of self-construal. The instrument SCS is usually used
in cross-cultural studies and this have been the focal point of the research
study that is being critique.

Building on from those
ideas, this academic critique paper identifies the interesting viewpoint of Dr.
Lilia Gabriela Miramontes on her dissertation about the cross-cultural study on
the structure and measurement of Self-Construal Scale, which was conducted on
August 2011 at the College of Education in Washington State University. This
paper aims to scrutinize the theoretical inquiries and evaluation of the work
in detail. Further, the paper looks into the significant concept of putting the
individualism-collectivism into the application of the two domains of
self-construal as a theoretical framework.